This originally appeared on the Freedom Collection I once had a college history professor who taught that human history could be summed up in the following axiom: mankind’s search for stability. To be sure, this has often been the primary objective of diplomacy and realpolitik in the modern era. Nevertheless, if the bloody chaos of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries has revealed anything, it’s that this Westphalian aspiration was itself transient. Over the past decades, undemocratic systems that decreed the superiority of stability have one by one been replaced in the search for individual freedom. Some of these systems sought social stability and the soothing panacea of equality preached by the communists. Other systems sought economic stability brought, they insisted, only through fascist control. Some dictatorships were imposed for the stated goal of assuring tribal, racial or clan stability. In all these situations, the results were the same: the arbitrary control of majorities by an empowered few. Time and again, courageous people have thrown off the chains of this so-called stability to embark upon the chaotic, uncertain and often dangerous search for individual freedom. In doing so, those leading the charge have quickly discovered the most frustrating aspect of this journey: a lifetime will not be enough. Unlike the false stability of dictators past and present, imposed quickly through the use of violence, the advance of freedom is not rapid and cannot be imposed. True freedom is instead a daily awakening that infiltrates the minds of the oppressed over time. As President Dwight D. Eisenhower once said, “Freedom has its life in the hearts, the actions, the spirit of men and so it must be daily earned and refreshed – else like a flower cut from its life-giving roots, it will wither and die.” Because of this fact, too often there are reverses. Those who have fought for freedom in places like Caracas, Managua, and Harare know this all too well. Frustrating though it may be, until a culture of freedom takes root in society people will all too often choose stability over true freedom. Those who have begun the process should not lose heart. As Samuel Adams, an American founding father, was quoted as saying, “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.” The true freedom fighters – some of whose stories are told here in the Freedom Collection – are that minority. In their tirelessness and often difficult struggles come the small advances which, when added together, continue to change the face of the world for liberty. This post was written by Joel D. Hirst, a Human Freedom Fellow at the George W. Bush Institute. Find him on Twitter: @joelhirst
-
Join 924 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- September 2013
- December 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
Recent Comments
Categories
Meta
What people don’t realize is that stability and instability, order and chaos always will always be in balance. If you try to create stability and order, you will get more instability and chaos. Democratic polities are thus stable and ordered precisely because of their underlying (apparent) instability and chaos. The question is, do you want a chaotic society because you are attempting to impose order, or an ordered society because you are allowing people to behave as they will behave, with their interactions resulting in an emergent, complex order? Societies are necessarily complex. When we try to impose order on them, they break apart. Democracy is a self-organizing process with emergent properties, on the edge of order and chaos, and thus a spontaneous order. Such orders are in fact the most stable. It is no coincidence they are also the most free.
LikeLike